3 ms·
You're allowed to do that. You're not allowed to shoot them. It's a meaningful distinction. Disclaimer: for the record, and because I think it needs to be stat
by julianeon 2y ago
You're allowed to do that. You're not allowed to shoot them. It's a meaningful distinction.
Disclaimer: for the record, and because I think it needs to be stated directly, I don't believe this man was killed by OpenAI.
- maeil 2y ago> You're allowed to do that. You're not allowed to shoot them. It's a meaningful distinction. So what? Why is this meaningful?
- thephyber 2y agoOne of these things is unremarkable to the extent that it happens all day, every day. The other is uncommon in developed countries that mostly follow the rule of law. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
- itishappy 2y agoWhat's meaningful about the distinction between killing someone and suing/smearing them? Really? The dispute process is rather different, for starters.
- nerdponx 2y agoYou're not "allowed" to do that. Frivolous litigation is against federal law in the USA. There are also laws against harassment. You can get away with it, but you aren't technically allowed to do it.
- crustaceansoup 2y agoIs there a meaningful difference between "technically not allowed but unenforced" and "allowed"? People and smaller corporations are drowned all the time with no real recourse other than "just be more rich so you can hire your own giant legal/PR/marketing teams"
- potsandpans 2y agoOh, well if you're allowed to do that, then it's ok i guess.