4 ms·
Don't think the article is doing good job explaining how it is a dead end. It is definitely not slowing down, so a 'dead-end' would imply we are going to hit s
by FrustratedMonky 2y ago
Don't think the article is doing good job explaining how it is a dead end.
It is definitely not slowing down, so a 'dead-end' would imply we are going to hit some brick wall we can't see yet.
- EerkeBoiten 2y agoAuthor here. Disagree on not slowing down. Indeed "dead end" isn't really the focus of the argument, editor's choice of title, not mine. Focus of argument is these systems are foundationally unreliable so can't be used as critical applications [though maybe as intensively managed components of such].