4 ms·
We do not know what secrets he had for the witness stand. It could have been internal directives like "F*** copyright" or worse.
by throwaway123127 2y ago
We do not know what secrets he had for the witness stand. It could have been internal directives like "F*** copyright" or worse.
- KennyBlanken 2y ago[flagged]
- nadermx 2y agoCopyright theft? Spew much copyright propaganda. Even courts don't call it theft[0] [0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dowling_v._United_States_(1985) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dowling_v._United_States_(19...
- ghaff 2y agoWhy would that matter? What they and other companies are doing with available publicly available data (whether copyrighted or not) is a matter of fact and subject to law. The opinion of their executives on copyright regimes is pretty much irrelevant.
- noname120 2y agoIntent matters in court.