4 ms·
It only has to be less likely to cause that issue than a paralegal to be a net positive. Some people expect AI to never make mistakes when doing jobs where peo
by transcriptase 2y ago
It only has to be less likely to cause that issue than a paralegal to be a net positive.
Some people expect AI to never make mistakes when doing jobs where people routinely make all kinds of mistakes of varying severity.
It’s the same as how people expect self-driving cars to be flawless when they think nothing of a pileup caused by a human watching a reel while behind the wheel.
- WhyOhWhyQ 2y agoAny evidence it's actually better than a paralegal? I doubt it is.
- voltaireodactyl 2y agoIn the pileup example, the human driver is legally at fault. If a self driving car causes the pileup, who is at fault?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- qup 2y agoWell, maybe its wheel fell off. So, the mechanic who maintenanced it last? ... We don't fault our tools, legally. We usually also don't fault the manufacturer, or the maintenance guy. We fault the people using them.
- herval 2y agoMy understanding is the firm operating the car is liable, in the full self driving case of commercial vehicles (waymo). The driver is liable in supervised self driving cases (privately owned Tesla)