4 ms·
What I find curious is that the people who sell the AI as the holy grail that will make any jobs obsolete in a few year at the same time claim that there's huge
by mrtksn 2y ago
What I find curious is that the people who sell the AI as the holy grail that will make any jobs obsolete in a few year at the same time claim that there's huge talent shortage and even engage in feud on immigration and spend capital to influence immigration policies.
Apparently they don't believe that AI is about to revolutionize things that much. This makes me believe that significant part of the AI investment is just FOMO driven, so no real revolution is around the corner.
Although we keep seeing claims that AI achieved PHD level this Olympics level that, people who actually own these keep demanding immigration policy changes to bring actual humans from overseas for year to come.
- fhd2 2y agoIs that so? I'm not in the US, so I don't have a good idea of what's going on there. But wasn't there relatively high unemployment among developers after all these Big Tech layoffs post pandemic? Shouldn't companies there have an easy time finding local talent? Sorry for the potentially silly question. I just spent some time trying to research it and came up with nothing concrete.
- mrtksn 2y ago> But wasn't there relatively high unemployment among developers after all these Big Tech layoffs post pandemic? I'm speculating too but yes it appears that unemployment is pretty high among the CS majors: https://www.reddit.com/r/csMajors/comments/1hhl060/how_is_it_this_bad/ https://www.reddit.com/r/csMajors/comments/1hhl060/how_is_it... But at the same time there's an ongoing infighting among Trump supporters because tech elites came up as pro - skilled immigration where the MAGA camp turned against them. The tech elites claim that there's a talent shortage. Here's a short rundown that Elon Musk agrees with: https://x.com/AutismCapital/status/1872408010653589799 https://x.com/AutismCapital/status/1872408010653589799
- exe34 2y agoHave you maybe confused the time periods in the different discussions? I think the AI making jobs obsolete part is in the next few years, whereas the talent shortage issue is right now - although as usual, it's a wage issue, not a talent issue. Pay enough and the right people will turn up.
- mrtksn 2y agoWho knows about the future, right? I'm just trying to read the expectations of the people who have control over both the AI, Capital and Politics and they don't strike me as optimistic about AI actually doing much in near future.
- exe34 2y agothey seem to be investing a lot into replacing workers with AI.
- mrtksn 2y agoAnd that might be a FOMO or they can simply exit with profit as long as they can flame up the hype. An of course, they may be hoping to have it in long term. They are not replacing their workers despite claiming that AI is currently as good as a PHD and they certainly don't go to AI medical doctors despite claiming that their tool is better than most doctors.
- hackable_sand 2y agoIt's not a wage issue.
- exe34 2y agoare you saying the free market doesn't work?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- nyarlathotep_ 2y agoSchrodinger's Job Market, yeah. The whole conversation is so dishonest. Every software firm, notable and small, has had layoffs over the past two years, but somehow there's still a "STEM shortage" and companies are "starving for talent" or some such nonsense? Fake discussion.