4 ms·
>Well if 95% of the population use a term to mean one thing, then arguing that no it really means something else doesn't get you anywhere. It's not about getti
by batista 14y ago
>Well if 95% of the population use a term to mean one thing, then arguing that no it really means something else doesn't get you anywhere.
It's not about getting "somewhere". It's called computer SCIENCE, remember?
- aidenn0 14y agoWhen someone says "object oriented" unless they define their terms, or are clearly coming from the smalltalk school, I assume they are talking about C++/Java style OO, since that assumption is right the most often. This is particularly true when someone is talking about "what's wrong" with OOP