3 ms·
Crimea was Russian from the 1700s It became a Russian colonial possession around that time. But that did not in any way establish an innate "Russian-ness" to
by aguaviva 2y ago
Crimea was Russian from the 1700s
It became a Russian colonial possession around that time. But that did not in any way establish an innate "Russian-ness" to the peninusla that overrides modern international law. Specifically multiple treaties affirming Ukraine's sovereignty over the Crimea that Russia itself signed (and which the Crimean electorate also ratified in 1991 via an internationally recognized referendum). And which Russia again affirmed via another major treaty in 1994.
Russia has a much stronger claim on Crimea than Ukraine, historically speaking.
You can believe you want about historical "claims" and whatever they are supposed to even mean. The vastly bigger point (and the only point that really matters in this context) is that in the 21st century, we don't go around starting wars that will inevitably murder hundreds of thousands of people so at one side can get a shot at "correcting" past border resolutions (that it never formally disputed in the first place).
There is a name for this tendency - "territorial revanchism". You might want to look at what happened the last time a major power in Europe started to pretend to believe that it had a historical imperative to avenge and reverse prior "humiliations":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revanchism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revanchism
The Ukraine side has fascists of their own
As does your country, I'm sure. That doesn't mean that other countries get to start invading and bombing your hometown willy-nilly. And if they did, I somehow doubt you'd be getting on HN to tell us that "It isn't as black and white as people make it out to be. After all, we've got fascists of our own in this country. So the invaders have a point too, you know."
This entire conflict is based on overlapping and often contradictory versions of history.
The history really isn't that complicated, and the whole idea that the conflict is in any way based on "history" is part of the fabric of myths used by the aggressor to justify its invasion and to mollify and deflect opposition to it.
The war is about the ideology and interests of the small clique that runs Russia's current regime. Not about Ukraine or its history.