Generally, that's a good approach to show the capabilities of such a system. But, I think, it isn't so much suitable to do a comparison benchmark, because it ju

Generally, that's a good approach to show the capabilities of such a system. But, I think, it isn't so much suitable to do a comparison benchmark, because it just results in an 1 in case Texmacs, or some function of, is running or 0, if TeXmacs or some function is not running. Just imagine the both extremas: - translated every feature very good to other language, but not the main function, and hence, the proggi is not starting - no functions or feature is properly translated, but it starts. Which will get the better mark? In my eyes, it would be the second one - it's starting in the end. So, a benchmark must consist of a lot of different comparable tasks and not of a single (oss) program like TeXmacs. If I've understood everything properly... This approach seems not manageable.