3 ms·
I've been a beta tester from very early on. I came for the performance but stayed for the stability. I've only had a rare few crashes and all but one was a dupl
by jbergstroem 2y ago
I've been a beta tester from very early on. I came for the performance but stayed for the stability. I've only had a rare few crashes and all but one was a duplicate in the bug tracker.
I thought I needed search but as Mitchell put it, not a 1.0 feature. Ripgrep was always the answer.
Very happy to share the ghostty experience with the world!
- sionisrecur 2y agoSearch was the first thing I noticed it was lacking. I hope it can be added at some point, sometimes you can't just run a command again to grep it.
- mixmastamyk 2y agoGuessing y’all mean search of the scrollback buffers?
- 3r7j6qzi9jvnve 2y ago(probably, I was also looking for that)
- rainbowjelly 2y agoMitchell said it is planned in a recent interview on the Changelog podcast[1], just not in time for 1.0. [1]: https://changelog.com/podcast/622 https://changelog.com/podcast/622
- fn-mote 2y agoThe kitty method of piping the scroll back buffer to a pager is more general - it also seems like a quick fix to achieve this desired feature.
- sionisrecur 2y agoI noticed a keybinding for write_scrollback_file (defaults to super+shift+j) which does this. So you can use `grep something <super+shift+j>` to search for things. It's a nice workaround until search is implemented.
- WD-42 2y agoI really like how Kitty handles search. I thought it was a hack at first - then came to realize why re-implement search if less works better?