2 ms·
The evidence proved he wasn't there. The evidence they were trying to use to prove he should be charged was rather worthless. Eyewitness testimony is extremely
by ktallett 2y ago
The evidence proved he wasn't there. The evidence they were trying to use to prove he should be charged was rather worthless. Eyewitness testimony is extremely unreliable and this didn't even give him, just someone sort of similar but not someone similar who definitely committed the crime. Motive without evidence is meaningless, you can't fit evidence to a person, evidence should lead you to a person. If it doesn't then you don't have a case
- 1659447091 2y agoI see I should have worded my statement better. The article say the eye witness ID'd him, not someone like him. But he obviously saw someone like him and thought it was him since it was not. But we only know that after the fact. It is enough, with all the rest added, to charge someone. Luckily we have due process in the US, and it worked exactly as it was meant too and the charges were dismissed, standard operating procedure. All the fanfare is because the show decided to exploit the story for a documentary where they wrongly claim they are the reason for the charges being dismissed.