3 ms·
I agree that deviating from MST costs more than it benefits. --- However, this proposal is not entirely pointless. The point is: 1. Existing UTC timekeeping
by paulddraper 2y ago
I agree that deviating from MST costs more than it benefits.
---
However, this proposal is not entirely pointless. The point is:
1. Existing UTC timekeeping is unmodified. (profoundly non-negotiable)
2. Any two timestamps after 2035 different by an accurate number of physical seconds.
---
Given that MST is already a feature of UTC, I agree removing it seems silly.