> journal Lancet, calling the lab leak hypothesis a conspiracy theory (…) One of the authors was Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance, a nonprofit that has worked

> journal Lancet, calling the lab leak hypothesis a conspiracy theory (…) One of the authors was Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance, a nonprofit that has worked extensively on coronavirus research with the Wuhan institute. Wasn’t that odd? The person involved with the lab said “nothing to see” and it’s all a conspiracy theory. And a prestigious journal published it, and the media then beat everyone on the head with it at the slightest hint of disagreement. Do you want for people to lose confidence in the scientific community and fuel more conspiracy theories, because that’s exactly how you do it. > Fauci has denied ever calling the lab leak a conspiracy theory and says that scenario can’t be excluded. There should be a name for conspiracies that were once it conspiracy theories. There is something more interesting about them than the plain ol’ boring conspiracies.