3 ms·

Sure, but it is an appropriate label for Russia today.

• tolaya7263owube 2y ago
  [dead]
• Qwertious 2y ago
  Destroying infrastructure isn't automatically terrorism. If Russia bombed people (or e.g. caved in a building where civilians could be expected to inhabit and thereby die in the collapse) then it would be terrorism. Cable bombing isn't terrorism, it's just sparkling warfare.
  • questinthrow 2y ago
    Russia also bombs people though.
  • wiseowise 2y ago
    > If Russia bombed people (or e.g. caved in a building where civilians could be expected to inhabit and thereby die in the collapse) then it would be terrorism. Cable bombing isn't terrorism, it's just sparkling warfare. > If You probably meant "when", friend.
  • aguaviva 2y ago
    If Russia bombed people (or e.g. caved in a building where civilians could be expected to inhabit and thereby die in the collapse) then it would be terrorism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mariupol_theatre_airstrike https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mariupol_theatre_airstrike