3 ms·

be aware that the term 'terrorist' can be applied today to somebody that one day can win the Nobel prize for peace, and then become bad again. It is a label

• brookst 2y ago
  Sure, but it is an appropriate label for Russia today.
  • tolaya7263owube 2y ago
    [dead]
  • Qwertious 2y ago
    Destroying infrastructure isn't automatically terrorism. If Russia bombed people (or e.g. caved in a building where civilians could be expected to inhabit and thereby die in the collapse) then it would be terrorism. Cable bombing isn't terrorism, it's just sparkling warfare.
    • questinthrow 2y ago
      Russia also bombs people though.
    • wiseowise 2y ago
      > If Russia bombed people (or e.g. caved in a building where civilians could be expected to inhabit and thereby die in the collapse) then it would be terrorism. Cable bombing isn't terrorism, it's just sparkling warfare. > If You probably meant "when", friend.
    • aguaviva 2y ago
      If Russia bombed people (or e.g. caved in a building where civilians could be expected to inhabit and thereby die in the collapse) then it would be terrorism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mariupol_theatre_airstrike https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mariupol_theatre_airstrike