And in what sense are the Shakespearean monkeys an unhealthy rabble? I'm currently vibing that those popular+attentionally-limited links are necessary, but not

And in what sense are the Shakespearean monkeys an unhealthy rabble? I'm currently vibing that those popular+attentionally-limited links are necessary, but not sufficient, for wisdom uncovery.. And that a healthier route may involve actively compensating for the intrinsic asymmetry between Rao's weird & hypernormal in his "new systems of survival". (Contrast with Jane Jacobs' guardian/commercial, or Rao's latest Mandala/Machine dichotomy, when the yinyang dynamic is much more obvious) As I mentioned to GP earlier, one design bug with the current dynamic is that there is no affordance* for the hook of enlightenment (moksha) to turn into sustainable (re)production (flow, aka samsara) Imagine the Shakespearean monkeys, but with a mechanism to string together some of the shorter uncoveries.. * Adfordance, heh Lagniappe: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgeworth%27s_limit_theorem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgeworth%27s_limit_theorem