3 ms·
You can reduce your Java boilerplate to annotations or succinct XML or whatever. Code generation is used a lot on the JVM. Can you show a real compiler message
by cess11 2y ago
You can reduce your Java boilerplate to annotations or succinct XML or whatever. Code generation is used a lot on the JVM.
Can you show a real compiler message about such a semicolon?
- lisper 2y ago% cat test.c main () { int x x=1 } % gcc test.c test.c:1:1: warning: type specifier missing, defaults to 'int' [-Wimplicit-int] main () { ^ test.c:2:8: error: expected ';' at end of declaration int x ^ ; 1 warning and 1 error generated.
- cess11 2y agoI added int to the main declaration to clean the irrelevant warning, and I get this: tst.c: In function ‘main’: tst.c:3:5: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘x’ 3 | x=1 | ^ tst.c:3:5: error: ‘x’ undeclared (first use in this function) tst.c:3:5: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in tst.c:3:8: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘}’ token 3 | x=1 | ^ | ; 4 | } | ~ gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 I get three errors, all on line 3 rather than 2, and as the first of them says, there are at least four alternatives for resolution besides semicolon. Full code after adding type to main, including linter message from c.vim: 1 int main () { 2 int x E 3 x=1 /\* E: 'x' undeclared (first use in this function) 4 } .