3 ms·
Except it's not because: 1) It has differences in behavior with certain classes and is not a drop-in replacement. 2) It always compiles, so it's kind of slow
by jbverschoor 2y ago
Except it's not because:
1) It has differences in behavior with certain classes and is not a drop-in replacement.
2) It always compiles, so it's kind of slow to compile-test
- viraptor 2y agoIt's not a 100% compatible replacement, but I've ported a few things with only trivial chances. I didn't say it's a drop in, just that it's a fine choice. Compile/test time is ok. It's a few extra seconds to run tests, but hasn't been an issue in practice for me.