3 ms·
> this isn't something they'd ever need anyways. Oh I do that quite often, either because I didn’t realise I was committing on the wrong branch, or I decided t
by williamdclt 2y ago
> this isn't something they'd ever need anyways.
Oh I do that quite often, either because I didn’t realise I was committing on the wrong branch, or I decided to split my work in two branches, or i need some other unmerited change for my current branch…
It’s usually a rebase —onto or cherry-pick, I’d say I agree it’s not simple.
jj seems interesting, I’m very comfortable with git but I think its UX is terrible, but everyone use git and it is not an area where I have capacity or willingness to innovate. I’d love to see git being replaced with something better designed though
- stouset 2y agoNobody else needs to convert to jj for you to use it, so there’s no real downside to switching.
- williamdclt 2y agoThe downside part is "it is not an area where I have capacity or willingness to innovate". I'd happily follow, I don't care enough to lead the innovation.
- Macha 2y agoYeah, this is the real advantage that jj (and sapling) have compared to how many years I'd been hearing about fossil and seeing it as a non-starter to experiment with.