4 ms·
Most AI-generated images I've come across (I have in mind Substacks, Medium posts and other personal blogs) are purely "decorative" & having the same (lack of)
by aragonite 2y ago
Most AI-generated images I've come across (I have in mind Substacks, Medium posts and other personal blogs) are purely "decorative" & having the same (lack of) purpose as stock photography - e.g. a generic photo of people exercising in an article about fitness. In informational articles I find these pointless & also maybe somewhat in poor taste. But then I'd probably feel the same way about regular stock photography.
There may be potential for AI-generated explanatory visuals though. High-quality diagrams, graphs, map of complex conceptual relationships and so on would be exciting.
- coffeebeqn 2y agoThat would need to be a whole new model that’s not based on pixels but these nodes and edges. All AI generated maps or diagrams look absolutely unhinged
- john_the_writer 2y agoThe difference between stock and AI would be how they came to be "free". Stock comes from people posing. AI comes from stealing the peoples poses.