Not likely at all. Person A. B is controlled by A, and C impacts A's control of B. The concept of B solving C, while at the same time having no impact on C, i

Not likely at all. Person A. B is controlled by A, and C impacts A's control of B. The concept of B solving C, while at the same time having no impact on C, is patently absurd (contradictory), and the reasoning path demonstrably circular without identity (hegelian). It lacks rationally accepted structure to be anything except hopes, wishes, dreams, or delusion.