2 ms·

I felt like I got the gist after the first two: > Adopting Wide Event-style instrumentation has been one of the highest-leverage changes I’ve made in my engine

• zahlman 2y ago
  >I felt like I got the gist after the first two: What I get is: here's a thing that made a big improvement to how I debug systems. Except, it turns out that the systems in question are very specific ones. > The tl;dr is that for each unit-of-work in your system (usually, but not always an HTTP request / response) you emit one “event” with all of the information you can collect about that work. Okay, but... as opposed to what? And why is it better this way? >“Event” is an over-loaded term in telemetry so replace that with “log line” or “span” if you like. They are all effectively the same thing. In the programming I do, "event" doesn't mean anything to do with logging or telemetry.
• treyfitty 2y ago
  That doesn’t really give an objective definition of what wide events are, just an opinion and example in this one persons life. I had to lookup wide events in the middle of the article, and I can’t say I can viscerally see and feel the benefits the OP was espousing. Just felt like an adderall-fueled dump of information being thrown at me.