3 ms·
They do if they're made illegal. Laws are just made up anyway and only relevant because people with the means to enforce them (aka guns) exist. I think intelle
by freedomben 2y ago
They do if they're made illegal. Laws are just made up anyway and only relevant because people with the means to enforce them (aka guns) exist.
I think intellectual property laws need radical overhaul and reduction, and I think the current iteration is based on shakey philosophical principles anyway, but you won't get very far with straw men arguments, over-reductionism, or bad legal advice.
- adolph 2y agoTo recap: >>> . . . worried that the internet will get less and less free as tactics like this become more common >> On the other hand, where do you draw the line with regards to lawbreaking? > Do electrons on a wire or photons on glass break laws? I’ll restate the point: laws that address the means and not the behavior are ripe for abuse. That some exist doesn’t justify their expansion.