> but it also implies that SOME workers will no longer have jobs due to their inability to compete on a global market. It's so bizzare that making things more

> but it also implies that SOME workers will no longer have jobs due to their inability to compete on a global market. It's so bizzare that making things more efficient and in effect saving humans from the burden of inefficient labor is seen as negative. Tying people's survival to their ability to sell their labor is such a terrible idea in this day and age.