3 ms·
Not at all. Money represents resources, and it’s objectively better for society for resources to be in the hands of people who are not fools, instead of those
by sneak 2y ago
Not at all. Money represents resources, and it’s objectively better for society for resources to be in the hands of people who are not fools, instead of those who are.
- dwaltrip 2y agoYou sound foolish, I’m gonna need to take all your money. Don’t worry, I’m being objective.
- wisty 2y agoThe argument is that the objective test is whether you can actually convince anyone to hand over money.
- dwaltrip 2y agoNo, they are making a moral argument, and claiming their view is the objectively moral position. It’s “better for society” was the phrase.
- tedunangst 2y agoWe don't need to take money from the fools. They'll give it away.
- Yizahi 2y agoYou can get like minded people and go roleplay feudalism with guns somewhere else, please leave people with empathy out of it. PS: don't forget to document your inevitable failure, just like every libertarian "non-fools" community previously.