3 ms·
llms.txt has a section on "Existing standards" which completely forgets about well-known[0], there's an issue opened three months[1] ago but it seems it was ign
by riffraff 2y ago
llms.txt has a section on "Existing standards" which completely forgets about well-known[0], there's an issue opened three months[1] ago but it seems it was ignored.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Well-known_URI https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Well-known_URI
[1] https://github.com/AnswerDotAI/llms-txt/issues/2 https://github.com/AnswerDotAI/llms-txt/issues/2
- varenc 2y agoUsing `/.well-known/llms.txt` was the first thought that came to my mind as well. There's a long list of other special well-known URIs using it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Well-known_URI#List_of_well-known_URIs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Well-known_URI#List_of_well-kn...
- 8n4vidtmkvmk 2y agoWhy not llms.md since it's markdown?
- varenc 2y agoIt's true! But the whole point of Markdown is that its completely readable as plaintext as well. And many other well known URIs use the .txt extension. It's not my thing but I think keeping it .txt for simplicity and parity makes sense,
- jph00 2y agoUnfortunately this requires registration, which is not a simple process.
- sneak 2y agoNo more than throwing stuff in the root.
- dethos 2y agoExactly, this fits perfectly in the `.well-known` use cases. What a shame.