fascinating how one piece of bad journalism disqualifies whole research - we already have 2 comments (and I was about to post the 3rd) here about "why cellulose

fascinating how one piece of bad journalism disqualifies whole research - we already have 2 comments (and I was about to post the 3rd) here about "why cellulose is in the list of microplastics?" in my case I opened the news story with a question "what microplastics even are there in a paper bag??", then saw the sentence "The tea bags used for the research were made from the polymers nylon-6, polypropylene and cellulose."