Whether it's Cursor, Windsurf, or Copilot, AI coding is becoming increasingly smooth, intelligent, and impactful. However, anyone who has used it knows that AI

Whether it's Cursor, Windsurf, or Copilot, AI coding is becoming increasingly smooth, intelligent, and impactful. However, anyone who has used it knows that AI has difficulty coding a decent application from scratch. Compared to starting from scratch, AI is particularly adept at replicating and modifying existing models: if you provide a template and ask it to make changes, it can quickly develop an application that satisfies you. BTW: I strongly believe in the statement above, which is why my website was also developed using a combination of templates and AI. Overall, I am very satisfied with it. So, where can you find these templates? Hence, template0.com was created. > Why do I think the opposite, that templates are static and AI is dynamic? With AI, template site traffic should decrease because people won't need templates to jumpstart; they'll have AI generate things more aligned with their needs. From what I understand, AI still struggles with generating cohesive, comprehensive websites, and simple customization of templates can also be challenging for non-developers or those not familiar with the tech stack. The combination of AI coding and templates perfectly complements each other, making it very fast to launch a website like the one mentioned above. I've personally experienced that AI's auto-completion and editing capabilities are relatively high in usability. This is also evident in the prompts we commonly use with AI assistants. Providing examples is a crucial technique to improve the accuracy of AI (LLM) Chat responses and is one that everyone uses frequently.