Found this in a quick search, I know it's a random site and not an extensive review of data but could be a useful heuristic for discussion: https://www.scienced

Found this in a quick search, I know it's a random site and not an extensive review of data but could be a useful heuristic for discussion: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181211103139.htm https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181211103139.h... Summary from the link: "It is well known that poorer Americans are more likely to be obese or suffer from diabetes; there is a strong negative correlation between household income and both obesity and diabetes. This negative correlation, however, has only developed in the past 30 years, according to researchers. Since 1990, the rise of obesity and diabetes was fastest among the poorest US regions." So the decision to not allow total junk food appears to be a good one from possible data. Education about the low nutritional value and health harm of overconsumption of sugar-based drinks and foods could also help. Personally I would not have a problem with diet and sugar-free drinks and foods being eligible for food stamps.