3 ms·
This level of conspiracy thinking requires evidence to be useful. Edit: I do see from your profile that you are a real person though, so I say this with more r
by fn-mote 2y ago
This level of conspiracy thinking requires evidence to be useful.
Edit: I do see from your profile that you are a real person though, so I say this with more respect.
- dns_snek 2y agoWhat evidence do we need that AI companies are exploiting every bit of information they can use to get ahead in the benchmarks to generate more hype? Ignoring terms/agreements, violating copyright, and otherwise exploiting information for personal gain is the foundation of that entire industry for crying out loud.
- threeseed 2y agoSome people are also forgetting who is the CEO of OpenAI. Sam Altman has long talked about believing in the "move fast and break things" way of doing business. Which is just a nicer way of saying do whatever dodgy things you can get away with.
- cheald 2y agoOpenAI's also in the position of having to compete against other LLM trainers - including the open-weights Llama models and their community derivatives, which have been able to do extremely well with a tiny fraction of OpenAI's resources - and to justify their astronomical valuation. The economic incentive to cheat is extreme; I think that cheating has to be the default presumption.