3 ms·
If that were the case, then we would pick surgeons by randomly grabbing a person off the street, and not use surgeons that have been trained for years in their
by keiferski 2y ago
If that were the case, then we would pick surgeons by randomly grabbing a person off the street, and not use surgeons that have been trained for years in their profession.
But then you might say, "Medicine is a science, and art isn't. All art is relative and no one's opinion is better than another."
With that, I don't agree. I think someone who has spent more time studying a topic probably, not always, but probably has more insightful things to say about it. A Shakespeare scholar probably has more insights about Hamlet than a guy who read it in high school twenty years ago. In short, I reject the idea that expertise doesn't exist in evaluating the arts.
- carlosjobim 2y agoYou didn't get it. The surgeon is by necessity a random person before he learns his trade. Just like a reviewer. You're not born into it. Expertise in evaluating art is usually self-made expertise (the academic expertise in this field has zero value), meaning they're all "random people".
- keiferski 2y agoI “didn’t get it” because you wrote one cryptic line and didn’t communicate clearly. If you think academic expertise has no value, there isn’t much point in continuing this discussion.