You were presenting an either-or argument, pretty much along those lines. A basically very specious argument, it was. I was paraphrasing you, but not unfairly

You were presenting an either-or argument, pretty much along those lines. A basically very specious argument, it was. I was paraphrasing you, but not unfairly in that sense. The burden of proof is on those claiming genocide, not on me. The burden of proof is on the occupying forces, to show that they are not causing undue harm to the population affected. We could adjudicate this further, but as said - you've simply worn me out, via your patently spurious opening.