10 ms·
I will admit that the fifth amendment case isn't as clear cut as the others, by the letter of the law, but: > nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, wi
by thayne 2y ago
I will admit that the fifth amendment case isn't as clear cut as the others, by the letter of the law, but:
> nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law
I would argue that at least in some cases dmca takedown notices can deprive people of property, either by preventing them from making an income from their content, or causing them to lose access to a service for which they paid money, or have access to something of value.
I also think it deprives the poster of some degree of liberty.
Even if it isn't against the letter of the law it is against the spirit.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> Even if it isn't against the letter of the law it is against the spirit By that notion YouTube has the right to call a jury if I decide to cancel. Where we agree is in the sanctions. For the safe harbor to be removed there should be more process, and it should be explicit.