> You brought up "zero consequences for anyone responsible." Brian Thompson is dead, so that's N = 1 consequences. But you said zero. Which means you're presuma

> You brought up "zero consequences for anyone responsible." Brian Thompson is dead, so that's N = 1 consequences. But you said zero. Which means you're presumably talking about lawful consequences. I did not bring that up, I brought up more, including > Luigi proven right once again Which means "Without doing what he did, there would have been zero consequences". I also just brought this up, which is context you'll definitely be aware of, meaning it's even less likely anyone would be talking about law in this context: > You're probably aware that the whole premise of the support behind Luigi is that US law as it is currently applied has enormous issues, so arguing what is and isn't law is not a productive avenue in the first place. I don't think that in good faith, given the context and the entirety of my comment, you could reasonably come to the conclusion I was talking about law.