4 ms·

I don't think he did it. The guy on the camera in NYC didn't have a unibrow and Luigi clearly does. I think they have a scapegoat that they are trying to pin it

• JumpCrisscross 2y ago
  > guy on the camera in NYC didn't have a unibrow and Luigi clearly does Wat. Mangione has a light unibrow. That will obviously show up more clearly head on (as it does in the taxi photo) than from above looking at the tippy tops of the hair.
• avidiax 2y ago
  Not saying that's impossible. Certainly a ghost gun has an advantage to corrupt government agents just as it does to criminals. But it's going to be difficult to make it stick against a patsy. What will be very suspicious is if he dies in custody before trial. Otherwise, at trial, I expect: * He has no alibi * The ballistic evidence matches the gun. * He has possession of additional ammunition from the same lot. * He was in fact a client of UHC with a substantial claim denial history * His computers/phone show that he was cyber-stalking If they have all that, I don't think a reasonable person could believe that the FBI crime lab and Google can be coerced in a grand conspiracy into fabricating evidence. If it turns out that the gun is a "2nd ghost gun", and the prosecution claims that he ditched the 1st gun and the ammo, and his alibi is "weak", and he cleared his digital history, that would be a much weaker more suspicious case.
  • JumpCrisscross 2y ago
    > he was in fact a client of UHC with a substantial claim denial history It doesn't appear he was [1]. [1] https://apnews.com/article/luigi-mangione-united-healthcare-ceo-d148fbdde498c3ea4cf768945889d7e7 https://apnews.com/article/luigi-mangione-united-healthcare-...