3 ms·

I agree, Rust indeed has an important role as a new language for writing memory-safe code, but to repeat what I meant, I like to see entirely new projects built

I agree, Rust indeed has an important role as a new language for writing memory-safe code, but to repeat what I meant, I like to see entirely new projects built with Rust from the ground up, not bolting it onto existing C or C++ projects just because Rust. In the long run it will cause fragmentation and increase complexity to such a point that it could destabilize the original project in its entirety. Build new things with Rust if you like, keep existing C projects as C projects, that is all.

aw1621107 2y ago
> not bolting it onto existing C or C++ projects just because Rust. I feel "just because Rust" leans a bit towards the overly-dismissive side. I'd imagine Linus isn't interested in potentially adding support for Rust "just because Rust" - presumably he thinks there are potential concrete upsides that Rust offers over C that are worth expending time and effort to investigate despite the potential complications from introducing a new language. > In the long run it will cause fragmentation and increase complexity to such a point that it could destabilize the original project in its entirety. This sounds scary and all, but I'm admittedly a bit skeptical about this argument. Why would introducing Rust support necessarily lead to the outcome you describe? Are there examples of such an outcome happening to other projects?