> dishonest Potemkin It's like criticizing a "Hello World" program for not having proper error handling and security protocols. While those are important for p

> dishonest Potemkin It's like criticizing a "Hello World" program for not having proper error handling and security protocols. While those are important for production systems, they're not the point of a demonstration or learning example. Your response seems to take these examples and hold them to the standard of mission-critical systems, which is a form of technical gatekeeping - raising the bar unnecessarily high for what counts as a "valid" technical demonstration.