The mindset of the article is old-fashion. It labels the use of RC as a sign of weakness -- as if sending soldiers which end up as casualties is a sign of stren

The mindset of the article is old-fashion. It labels the use of RC as a sign of weakness -- as if sending soldiers which end up as casualties is a sign of strength. The Ukrainians won that battle with significant less human loss and cheap tech. That's all that counts tactically?