3 ms·
What is your point? That it's "undeserved" and that's bad somehow? I think it was a cool visualization and fun to see. And still, 60 hours of research is more
by matsemann 2y ago
What is your point? That it's "undeserved" and that's bad somehow?
I think it was a cool visualization and fun to see. And still, 60 hours of research is more than I would put into it, so even if I technically was able to I would've never gotten around to actually do it. So nice to see something else than what I normally work with, even if it might be trivial in that domain.
- larodi 2y agoMy point was that HN glorifies things it does not understand well, purely on aesthetic grounds. While real breakthroughs very often goes unnoticed. Its a bias. And struggling to find truth we should try to eliminate biases, we should first learn to see dem. Downvoting a comment which points out a very apparent bias is indeed just another testament to this ignorance. It is super ignoring to also downvote comment of actual geomatics practitioner and a teacher. It is sad if not else. The comment had zero judging whether is fair or deserved to get stupid points on some investor news site. I would love to see other aesthetic projects featured. But in all honesty - perhaps a GPT will get it right from the first time.