> so much so that I think it makes more sense to think of exploits as subscription services. I think this makes sense, especially given the uncertainty of when

> so much so that I think it makes more sense to think of exploits as subscription services. I think this makes sense, especially given the uncertainty of when an exploit gets patched. To my original argument of political power vs valuations you can probably say that having those same people you'd otherwise try to influence on your board with a financial incentive allows you to achieve the same thing, I'm not sure why I didn't consider that before.