3 ms·
I'd be curious to know what you think about this alternative architecture: http://mailinator.blogspot.com/2008/08/benchmarking-talkinator.html http://mailinato
by ntoshev 18y ago
I'd be curious to know what you think about this alternative architecture:
http://mailinator.blogspot.com/2008/08/benchmarking-talkinator.html http://mailinator.blogspot.com/2008/08/benchmarking-talkinat...
Paul Tyma claims handling 40000 chat messages per second on a quad core desktop system with it.
- axod 18y agoI tried a similar sort of architecture at one point, the issue is that if you share blocking calls in a thread, at some point something will block that you don't expect to. It's also just far far simpler to go with a single networking thread. Then pass off any cpu intensive, or long running tasks, or blocking tasks, to other threads.