3 ms·
many thanks! "Observational Equality: Now for Good" led me to "Observational Equality, Now!" which is a little easier for the layman to read without developing
by 082349872349872 2y ago
many thanks! "Observational Equality: Now for Good" led me to "Observational Equality, Now!" which is a little easier for the layman to read without developing a headache: "Observational Equality: Ow!"
- gsf_emergency 2y agoHeh I'm surprised (as in your fencing related dicta) that you got back on the trail.. what was the link chain?? Edit: if I told you this was the most layman paper I could find on my secondary (mostly killer-mode) ikigai, could you maybe deduce what the problem statement (aka MVP, to use some old country lingo) is, and even find a more appropriate paper for a layman? https://ems.press/content/serial-article-files/48098 https://ems.press/content/serial-article-files/48098
- 082349872349872 2y agohmm. I'd remembered it was short (3 hops?) from 42470111 but now I'm not seeing how I first got to TT^Obs from either of those starting points... cubic diracs are well out of my ken — even normal square ones are. are casimir elements and spins somewhere in the correct general direction? (otherwise the cubic doesn't make sense to me, as I don't think jerk normally enters physically motivated diffy-qs?)
- gsf_emergency 2y agoIf by spins you mean Cliff(Lie) then you got the 2 swords* I'm quite intrigued that enwiki hasn't vibed about that, but it has produced a lagniappe: P81 The shaggy steed of physics: mathematical beauty in the physical world Casimir elements, heh, it's why my Erdos number is lower than expected.. * or is it a pitchfork? also vibing currently that the hypernormal distrust models that appear simpler than their own, while the weird have the opposite inclination. Holding in mind that dynamic between YeGoblyneQueene & g***n as a fine example of the ur academic conflict which I believe Taleb was trying to direct attention to