4 ms·
You are watering down “the best” here, IMO. This definition leads towards “the most efficient production”, not “the highest art”. But sure, if you don’t care t
by throw646577 2y ago
You are watering down “the best” here, IMO. This definition leads towards “the most efficient production”, not “the highest art”.
But sure, if you don’t care that a human isn’t involved in doing it. Personally it’s not negotiable to me and I think more people believe this than you might expect.
- mcculley 2y agoI do see it as inevitable that models will create the best of everything. I completely understand that some humans will choose to reject anything not created by a human.
- tatersolid 2y agoBased on what evidence? AI models haven’t created the best of anything yet. Actually AI hasn’t even made anything I’d call very good thus far in my personal experience.
- mcculley 2y agoI agree that current models are not as good as humans. They will continue to improve. They will eventually be superhuman, just as they are at chess and go.