1) We should get to continue doing what we did. It makes a lot of money and we want to keep doing it 2) If we listened to the court in full, well, that would b

1) We should get to continue doing what we did. It makes a lot of money and we want to keep doing it 2) If we listened to the court in full, well, that would be communism and the terrorists winning all-in-one, due to the court, in effect, "[designing] your online experience," which Google and only Google should get to do. Search is Google's exclusive domain (but not in a crazy monopolistic way!) 3) This landscape is highly dynamic. In only the last year, Google has completely ruined Google through the innovative use of AI. Would a hyper intelligent monopoly do that?! I think not 4) The REAL harm in this market? The pain the Court inflicts on Mozilla by attacking us, poor and/or expert Google. Mozilla is like a little baby. Think of the children (Mozilla)