5 ms·
"It's arrogant to assume the best way you know how is the best way for the client." That's not what he's saying. He's saying that he's going to try as hard as
by matthewgifford 14y ago
"It's arrogant to assume the best way you know how is the best way for the client."
That's not what he's saying. He's saying that he's going to try as hard as he can to come up with what he thinks is the best solution to the problem. It may not be the best, but it's the best he can come up with. It's better than someone who comes up with five options, then leaves it up to the client to make the wrong decision.
I just don't understand the aversion to expertise that's so common these days. Have some fucking pride in what you do well. And trust that other people know their shit, too.
- Jare 14y agoIt's not about pride in your work, it's about the reality of your client. Options normally intend to cover aspects and requirements of the work that the client didn't even think of. Options can allow you to create a solution better than the local maxima that you would find within the confines of your client's understanding of his needs.
- matthewgifford 14y agoI'm not arguing that providing options (done the right way) is a bad way to do it. I'm just disagreeing with someone who says the Paul Rand way of doing things is arrogant. Some people are extremely good at what they do. They have have tons of experience. They do extensive research. And in the end they're able to produce a single solution that endures for decades. This should be celebrated.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- matthewgifford 14y agoAnd I'm not saying that your approach is necessarily wrong, either. I'm saying that for you to call his approach arrogant is wrong. Paul Rand did it that way because of what he was capable of. Apparently, some people agreed, because they paid him a lot of money to create iconic designs. You use your approach because it works for you and your clients. But you're also not Paul Rand.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]