3 ms·
Do you have an anecdote? I'm sure you're right and there are Britannica articles that are more accurate than their Wiki counterparts, but it'd be interesting to
by Cpoll 2y ago
Do you have an anecdote? I'm sure you're right and there are Britannica articles that are more accurate than their Wiki counterparts, but it'd be interesting to see an example.
- 1propionyl 2y agoIt would be an interesting use of AI tools to try to flag differences between the two as a means of identifying gaps in coverage or factual mistakes (in either one). And I specifically mean flag. As in, for human review. The last thing Wikipedia needs is spam AI edit submissions (it's probably already happening).
- mmooss 2y agoI don't see the value: If you mean the anecdote is evidence, it's much too small a sample to be representative of anything. If you don't believe any Britannica article is more accurate than a Wikipedia counterpart, you have other issues. :)