What bothers me is that the sentence isn't because of obvious and brazen lies to the court and fabricated evidence in his previous lawsuit, but merely for persi

What bothers me is that the sentence isn't because of obvious and brazen lies to the court and fabricated evidence in his previous lawsuit, but merely for persisting to file lawsuits after the original one was lost. In other words, in the UK, fabricating evidence is now a perfectly fine practice with no downsides - the worst is that you lose the case you would've lost anyway.