> My skeptical impression: it's complete hubris to conflate ARC or any benchmark with truly general intelligence. But isn’t it interesting to have several benc

> My skeptical impression: it's complete hubris to conflate ARC or any benchmark with truly general intelligence. But isn’t it interesting to have several benchmarks? Even if it’s not about passing the Turing test, benchmarks serve a purpose—similar to how we measure microprocessors or other devices. Intelligence may be more elusive, but even if we had an oracle delivering the ultimate intelligence benchmark, we'd still argue about its limitations. Perhaps we'd claim it doesn't measure creativity well, and we'd find ourselves revisiting the same debates about different kinds of intelligences.