> It’s not keeping them safe: it’s recording in order to facilitate an investigation if someone harms them. It's getting them used to wearing them on a pretext

> It’s not keeping them safe: it’s recording in order to facilitate an investigation if someone harms them. It's getting them used to wearing them on a pretext of being about monitoring customers, to ease them into a shift to an always-on policy which will be promoted as a simplification that will reduce the risk of forgetting or turning them on too late, but which will also allow them to be complete records of the employee’s behavior, which is almost certainly the real target.