3 ms·

I dunno, Gaza (on per-sqkm basis) still looks nothing like Hamburg '43. Until it looks at least like that everywhere, I'd say Israel is being too soft given the

• aguaviva 2y ago
  I dunno, Gaza (on per-sqkm basis) still looks nothing like Hamburg '43. In fact the numbers of civilians killed are roughly similar (probably 30k for Gaza vs. 40k for Hamburg 43-45) against roughly equal pre-war population size (about 1.5M for each). And the pictures are of course awfully similar as well (depending on where one wishes to zoom in). And Israel's not anywhere near done with Gaza yet. But of course you were just hand-waving, which is why you started off with "I dunno". Until it looks at least like that everywhere, I'd say Israel is being too soft An incredibly crass and nasty thing to say about a largely innocent population being steadily bombed into the ground.
• okokhacker 2y ago
  On the surface this is just another callous comment but you are making a few dangerous implications here: 1. Gaza is not as bad as Hamburg (for which no proof was provided) 2. Gaza has to be as bad as Hamburg for it to be called a genocide 3. You want Israel to make Gaza look like Hamburg ‘43 4. The historical precedent (without even getting into land occupation) of movements justifies a genocide.