3 ms·
Very interesting article. It also illustrates how dangerous unit conversions are especially combined with thousands separators: 20000km (GNSS satellite altitude
by myrmidon 2y ago
Very interesting article. It also illustrates how dangerous unit conversions are especially combined with thousands separators: 20000km (GNSS satellite altitude) is NOT 12.4 miles.
Does anyone know if it would be feasible nowadays to just use starlink (or other LEO satellites) as a GNSS constellation? Even without precise onboard-clocks, would it not be possible to just bounce clock signals from earth as long as latency is known?
- loxias 2y ago> as long as latency is known? Ah, but how do you know latency, without accurate clocks? :) Accurate clocks facilitates measuring latency, which is used to calculate distance. :)
- adgjlsfhk1 2y agostarlink is in a low enough orbit that it isn't ideal (atmospheric drag will make the position harder to accurately predict)
- lxgr 2y agoI’d be surprised if that were an issue. Starlink probably could learn the position of every satellite very accurately based on latency and signal strength and angle data from all the ground stations alone if they wanted to, if they don’t already.
- adgjlsfhk1 2y agoyou would need nanosecond accurate clocks in the satellites and groundstations
- lxgr 2y agoYes, this is actively being explored, see for example this for Iridium: https://investor.iridium.com/2021-05-24-Iridium-Makes-Strategic-Investment-in-DDK-Positioning,-Provider-of-Enhanced-GNSS-Accuracy-Solutions https://investor.iridium.com/2021-05-24-Iridium-Makes-Strate...
- grecy 2y agoElon tweeted a while back they could do positioning, but it’s just not a high priority right now